The ongoing political turmoil in Rivers State has drawn strong reactions from various legal and political analysts, with many questioning the Federal Government’s approach.
Prominent lawyer and public affairs analyst, Ope Banwo, has cautioned that the current intervention, particularly the perceived alignment with former Governor Nyesom Wike, could have long-term repercussions for both Wike and the political structure of the state. Speaking in an interview with TVC News from 17:50 , Banwo argued that the Federal Government’s involvement might not unfold as expected and could ultimately shift political control away from Wike’s camp.
The crisis in Rivers State escalated following the declaration of a state of emergency, a move that many believe was aimed at restoring order but is now being seen as a calculated political maneuver. Banwo expressed concern that the emergency measures could be used as a strategic tool to weaken the stronghold of Wike, who has been a dominant force in Rivers politics. According to him, with emergency powers in place, the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) could restructure the state’s leadership by replacing key figures and consolidating power in its favor.
He emphasized that political influence is never permanent, warning that Wike himself may soon realize the extent to which the situation could turn against him. “The Federal Government is coming down on the side of Wike that is in power with them, and I’m sure even Wike now will not like the direction because they have opened the door for APC now to take the state, because power is very transient,” Banwo stated. His remarks suggest that while Wike may have initially viewed the intervention as beneficial, the long-term implications could see him losing grip over the political structure he helped shape.
Banwo pointed out that the declaration of a state of emergency provides a rare opportunity for the APC to strengthen its influence in Rivers State, especially in preparation for future elections. He noted that within six months, the political landscape of the state could be altered significantly, with new individuals loyal to the ruling party taking positions of authority. Such a development, he argued, could lead to a fundamental shift in governance, where decisions made under emergency rule shape the political future of the state.