Legal scholar and public affairs analyst Sam Amadi has strongly criticised the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) over its handling of the leadership dispute within the African Democratic Congress (ADC), particularly actions affecting the faction reportedly led by former Senate President David Mark.
Amadi made these remarks during an interview on SYMFONI TV, where he weighed in on the controversy surrounding INEC’s decision, which has sparked debate among political stakeholders and legal observers. The situation has raised questions about the electoral body’s neutrality and adherence to due process in party affairs.
Speaking during the interview, Amadi questioned the legal basis for INEC’s move, insisting that the commission acted without proper judicial backing. “INEC had no directive from the court to remove anybody. It would appear from presumption, not evidence that INEC was acting a script,” he said. He argued that regulatory bodies must strictly operate within the confines of the law, especially in politically sensitive matters that could affect democratic stability.
Amadi further noted that actions perceived as biased or premeditated risk undermining public confidence in democratic institutions. According to him, INEC’s credibility depends heavily on its ability to remain impartial and guided by clear legal mandates rather than assumptions or external influence.
The ADC leadership dispute has been a subject of legal tussle and internal party conflict, with different factions laying claim to legitimacy. INEC’s involvement, particularly any perceived endorsement or rejection of a faction, has therefore drawn intense scrutiny. Read_More…